BACKYARD RANCH DRESSING & DIP vs HUMMUS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
HUMMUS wins in 7 out of 10 nutrient categories
BACKYARD RANCH DRESSING & DIP: 2
vs
HUMMUS: 7
(1 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACKYARD RANCH DRESSING & DIP | HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 321 cal | 167 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 5.6 g | |
| Carbs | 7.1 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fat | 32.1 g | 9.7 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 5.6 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACKYARD RANCH DRESSING & DIP | HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 6.7 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACKYARD RANCH DRESSING & DIP | HUMMUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 43 MG | 56 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 786 MG | 361 MG |