BACK TO NATURE vs MAPLE FUDGE
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MAPLE FUDGE wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
BACK TO NATURE: 3
vs
MAPLE FUDGE: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | BACK TO NATURE | MAPLE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 400 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 66.7 g | 66.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 20 g | 15 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | BACK TO NATURE | MAPLE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | BACK TO NATURE | MAPLE FUDGE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 90 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.2 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 70 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 383 MG | 167 MG |