ASSORTED FINE CHOCOLATES vs LUNDS & BYERLYS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LUNDS & BYERLYS wins in 5 out of 10 nutrient categories
ASSORTED FINE CHOCOLATES: 3
vs
LUNDS & BYERLYS: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ASSORTED FINE CHOCOLATES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 438 cal | 560 cal | |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 10 g | |
| Carbs | 62.5 g | 50 g | |
| Fat | 18.8 g | 38 g | |
| Fiber | 3.1 g | 8 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ASSORTED FINE CHOCOLATES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ASSORTED FINE CHOCOLATES | LUNDS & BYERLYS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 78 MG | 80 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 3.1 MG | 5.4 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 125 MG | 30 MG |