ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING vs LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING wins in 3 out of 10 nutrient categories
ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING: 2
vs
LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING: 3
(5 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 467 cal | 194 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 3.3 g | 6.5 g | |
| Fat | 50 g | 16.1 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING | LIGHT CHAMPAGINE DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 833 MG | 1,516 MG |