ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING vs ORGANIC DRESSING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING: 3
vs
ORGANIC DRESSING: 2
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 500 cal | 333 cal | |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 6.7 g | 6.7 g | Tie |
| Fat | 50 g | 33.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ASIAGO CAESAR DRESSING | ORGANIC DRESSING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 1,100 MG | 433 MG |