APPLE RINGS SWEET vs CLASSIC COLESLAW
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
CLASSIC COLESLAW wins in 6 out of 11 nutrient categories
APPLE RINGS SWEET: 2
vs
CLASSIC COLESLAW: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | APPLE RINGS SWEET | CLASSIC COLESLAW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 57 cal | 29 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 1.2 g | |
| Carbs | 12.9 g | 5.9 g | |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 2.4 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | APPLE RINGS SWEET | CLASSIC COLESLAW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 132.9 MG | 45.9 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | APPLE RINGS SWEET | CLASSIC COLESLAW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 58 MG | 46 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Potassium, K | 107 MG | 235 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 29 MG |