ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI vs QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI: 5
vs
QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS: 2
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI | QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 400 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 13.3 g | |
| Carbs | 63.3 g | 68.9 g | |
| Fat | 11.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 8.9 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI | QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI | QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 36 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 4.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 371 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |