ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI vs ORGANIC QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI: 5
vs
ORGANIC QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS: 3
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI | ORGANIC QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 400 cal | 378 cal | |
| Protein | 16.7 g | 11.1 g | |
| Carbs | 63.3 g | 68.9 g | |
| Fat | 11.7 g | 6.7 g | |
| Fiber | 10 g | 6.7 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI | ORGANIC QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ANCIENT GRAIN MUESLI | ORGANIC QUICK COOKING ROLLED OATS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 67 MG | 33 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 4.8 MG | 4.4 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 391 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |