ALMOND BARK vs DECORATING ICING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DECORATING ICING wins in 4 out of 10 nutrient categories
ALMOND BARK: 3
vs
DECORATING ICING: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND BARK | DECORATING ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 533 cal | 429 cal | |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Carbs | 73.3 g | 71.4 g | |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 17.1 g | |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND BARK | DECORATING ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 133 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 29 MG |