ALMOND BARK vs DECORATING ICING
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
DECORATING ICING wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALMOND BARK: 3
vs
DECORATING ICING: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALMOND BARK | DECORATING ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 532 cal | 417 cal | |
| Protein | 2.1 g | 0 g | |
| Carbs | 68.1 g | 66.7 g | |
| Fat | 29.8 g | 16.7 g | |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 0 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALMOND BARK | DECORATING ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALMOND BARK | DECORATING ICING | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 2.3 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 0 MG | 167 MG |