ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON vs MACKEREL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
MACKEREL wins in 4 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON: 3
vs
MACKEREL: 4
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 118 cal | 143 cal | |
| Protein | 18.8 g | 21.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 4.7 g | 5.4 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKAN WILD CAUGHT PINK SALMON | MACKEREL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 224 MG | 446 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 322 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 353 MG | 500 MG |