ALASKA WILD CAUGHT vs SPRINGFIELD
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
ALASKA WILD CAUGHT wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALASKA WILD CAUGHT: 5
vs
SPRINGFIELD: 4
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKA WILD CAUGHT | SPRINGFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 88 cal | 263 cal | |
| Protein | 18.2 g | 13.2 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 25 g | |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 13.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.3 g | |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKA WILD CAUGHT | SPRINGFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKA WILD CAUGHT | SPRINGFIELD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 12 MG | 53 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 388 MG | 0 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 74 MG | 408 MG |