ALASKA COD FILLETS vs WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
ALASKA COD FILLETS: 3
vs
WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | ALASKA COD FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 97 cal | |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 20.4 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0 g | 1.3 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | ALASKA COD FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 2.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | ALASKA COD FILLETS | WILD CAUGHT SNAPPER SKIN-ON FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 329 MG | 416 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 161 MG | 66 MG |