AHI TUNA vs SKIN-OFF WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
SKIN-OFF WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
AHI TUNA: 3
vs
SKIN-OFF WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AHI TUNA | SKIN-OFF WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 24.1 g | 17.0 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | AHI TUNA | SKIN-OFF WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D (D2 + D3) | 0 UG | 1 UG |
Minerals
| Mineral | AHI TUNA | SKIN-OFF WILD CAUGHT POLLOCK FILLETS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 9 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.8 MG | 0.3 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 438 MG | 330 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 45 MG | 161 MG |