AGED WHITE CHEDDAR vs JACK LINK'S
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
JACK LINK'S wins in 6 out of 10 nutrient categories
AGED WHITE CHEDDAR: 1
vs
JACK LINK'S: 6
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | AGED WHITE CHEDDAR | JACK LINK'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 464 cal | 286 cal | |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 50 g | |
| Carbs | 67.9 g | 17.9 g | |
| Fat | 17.9 g | 3.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | AGED WHITE CHEDDAR | JACK LINK'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | AGED WHITE CHEDDAR | JACK LINK'S | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 71 MG | 0 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 5.1 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 500 MG | 2,143 MG |