80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK vs PORK TENDERLOIN
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK wins in 7 out of 14 nutrient categories
80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK: 7
vs
PORK TENDERLOIN: 5
(2 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK | PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 250 cal | 98 cal | |
| Protein | 17.0 g | 17.9 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 2.7 g | |
| Fat | 19.6 g | 2.2 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK | PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Niacin | 4.5 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin B-12 | 2.1 UG | 0 UG | |
| Vitamin B-6 | 0.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | 80% LEAN 20% FAT GROUND BEEF CHUCK | PORK TENDERLOIN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0 MG | |
| Selenium, Se | 16 UG | 0 UG | |
| Sodium, Na | 67 MG | 277 MG | |
| Zinc, Zn | 4.0 MG | 0 MG |