16/20 OZ SNAPPER FILLET vs RET BAG V/P POLLOCK FILL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RET BAG V/P POLLOCK FILL wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
16/20 OZ SNAPPER FILLET: 3
vs
RET BAG V/P POLLOCK FILL: 5
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 16/20 OZ SNAPPER FILLET | RET BAG V/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 cal | 89 cal | |
| Protein | 20.4 g | 19.6 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 16/20 OZ SNAPPER FILLET | RET BAG V/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.6 MG | 0 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | 16/20 OZ SNAPPER FILLET | RET BAG V/P POLLOCK FILL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 46 MG | 60 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.3 MG | 0.5 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 416 MG | 357 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 89 MG |