100% GRASS FED vs 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 10 nutrient categories
100% GRASS FED: 3
vs
100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS: 3
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 100% GRASS FED | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 232 cal | 295 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 15.2 g | 25.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 100% GRASS FED | 100% GRASS FED ANGUS BEEF BONE-IN SHORT RIBS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Iron, Fe | 0 MG | 2.1 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 214 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 54 MG | 58 MG |