4/6 OZ SNAPPER PORTIONS vs RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL wins in 5 out of 11 nutrient categories
4/6 OZ SNAPPER PORTIONS: 2
vs
RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL: 5
(4 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 4/6 OZ SNAPPER PORTIONS | RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 cal | 88 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 19.5 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 4/6 OZ SNAPPER PORTIONS | RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 1.6 MG | 1.6 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 4/6 OZ SNAPPER PORTIONS | RET BAG V/P GROUPER FIL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 27 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 0.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 420 MG | 478 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 62 MG | 53 MG |