31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP vs 52/70 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
52/70 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP wins in 3 out of 11 nutrient categories
31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP: 2
vs
52/70 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP: 3
(6 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP | 52/70 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 71 cal | Tie |
| Protein | 15.9 g | 15.3 g | |
| Carbs | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP | 52/70 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 31/35 S/ON WHITE SHRIMP | 52/70 CPD T/OFF SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 23 MG | 71 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 2.4 MG | 0 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
| Sodium, Na | 168 MG | 400 MG |