16/20 WHITE SHRIMP S/ON vs 50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
16/20 WHITE SHRIMP S/ON: 4
vs
50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 16/20 WHITE SHRIMP S/ON | 50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 71 cal | 80 cal | |
| Protein | 13.4 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g | Tie |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 16/20 WHITE SHRIMP S/ON | 50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 1.1 MG |
Minerals
| Mineral | 16/20 WHITE SHRIMP S/ON | 50/60 IQF PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 54 MG | 35 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 0.2 MG | 1.9 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 112 MG | 80 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 571 MG | 170 MG |