16/20 IQF S/ON SHRIMP vs KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP
Nutrition comparison per 100 g serving
Ad 468x60
It's a tie — both foods score equally across 11 nutrient categories
16/20 IQF S/ON SHRIMP: 4
vs
KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP: 4
(3 ties)
Overview
| Nutrient | 16/20 IQF S/ON SHRIMP | KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 107 cal | 71 cal | |
| Protein | 20.5 g | 16.1 g | |
| Carbs | 0.9 g | 0 g | |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.9 g | |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
| Sugar | 0 g | 0 g | Tie |
Vitamins
| Vitamin | 16/20 IQF S/ON SHRIMP | KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0 MG | 0 MG | Tie |
Minerals
| Mineral | 16/20 IQF S/ON SHRIMP | KEY WEST PINK SHRIMP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium, Ca | 70 MG | 80 MG | |
| Iron, Fe | 1.6 MG | 0.7 MG | |
| Potassium, K | 252 MG | 80 MG | |
| Sodium, Na | 143 MG | 116 MG |